My proposed study aims at evaluating the impacts of social distancing measures adopted in Hong Kong during the pandemic across different sub-populations, and exploring various coping strategies adopted across the social spectrums to mitigate the negative impacts of social distancing.
Department of Sociology
To curb the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing measures are enforced to restrict face-to-face contact among people. Economic and non-economic activities that involve face-to-face contact have to be reduced or suspended. These measures have caused major disruptions to our daily routines as well as the flow of resources needed to maintain our well-being. While social networks provide valuable resources for us to cope with life challenges, many resources are best delivered through face-to-face contacts, such as household assistance, physical care, and emotional support. Social distancing measures may thus impede the flow of such resources to people in need regardless of social strata and urge people to explore alternative means of resource delivery or substitutes. The accessibility to resources in a time of social distancing is influenced by the structure and composition of social networks, which in turn are affected by social locations, for example, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
My proposed study aims at evaluating the impacts of social distancing measures adopted in Hong Kong during the pandemic across different sub-populations, and exploring various coping strategies adopted across the social spectrums to mitigate the negative impacts of social distancing. Understanding the impacts of social distancing is crucial to evaluate the capacity of a society to undertake these drastic measures for a significant period. It will also help design better policies and directing resources more effectively to needy members in society if these measures are to be adopted ever again.
VIDEO
The Management of COVID-19: A New Model of Governance
Dr Dionysios Stivas
Dr Martin Chung
Department of Government & International Studies
This project aims at analyzing how and why some states dealt with the COVID-19 outbreak better than others. Our final objective is to construct a model of governance that could be effective in dealing with future communicable diseases’ outbreaks.
Department of Government & International Studies
This project aims at analyzing how and why some states dealt with the COVID-19 outbreak better than others. Our final objective is to construct a model of governance that could be effective in dealing with future communicable diseases’ outbreaks. Towards this end, this project will investigate the COVID-19 containment approaches of three different administrations:
- Taiwan adopted mild emergency measures even before experiencing any surge in the numbers of COVID-19 infections. So far, Taiwan has refrained from imposing any severe lockdown and has recorded insignificant numbers of deaths and COVID-19 related cases.
- The UK authorities initially opted for the “herd immunity” approach, subsequently they enforced some of the most restrictive measures experienced by the UK citizens in the last decades.
- The Chinese regime at the onset of the outbreak attempted to sooth the anxieties of the public by downplaying the seriousness of the disease. Following their initial failure to contain the virus spread, the authorities began to publicly accept the severity of the threat and undertake extraordinary emergency measures. Currently, China alleges that it has the outbreak under control.
Considering these diverse containment approaches, this project aims at highlighting the role of various factors in attaining these outcomes. By revealing the positive elements of each one of the three administrations’ responses, we expect to construct a model of governance that could be applicable, operational and effective in the case of future communicable diseases’ outbreaks.